The gap is not AI. It is the process around it.

Anyone can generate the screen. Someone has to own the experience.

Duplicate this page, then open Start here: the first week. Twenty minutes for you today. Nothing else needs to be read first.

High severity list

07 First 90 days

Start here: the first week

Two paths

Start. Little process, AI use is individual, nothing to fix yet. Reading order: 00, 02, 01, 04, 03, 07.

Fix. A process exists and AI arrived through tools nobody chose together. Reading order: 00, 02, 03, 01, 04, 07.

Part 00 tells you which one you are on. Read parts 05 and 06 when the 90 day plan calls for them.

The eight parts

Part The question You fill in
00 Where you are Is there a process? Where is AI already, and who owns it? The self check, then Inventory
01 Production map What are our steps, what does AI do at each, where must a human decide? The map, the gates, the step cards
02 Who owns what Which hats exist at our size, who decides, where does design sit? Hats
03 Rules What is allowed, with what data, gated by whom? The one page policy, Inventory, the exceptions log
04 Experience quality Who guards the user when anyone can generate output? High severity list, Defect log, the patterns file in your repo
05 Habits and incentives How does behavior change, and what do we reward? The incentive check, the rituals calendar
06 Measuring Did it work? Scorecard, Edit rate tally
07 First 90 days What happens week by week on our path? 90 day plan

The design lens: every part ends with an experience quality check. What can go wrong for the user here, and who notices.

00 Where you are

Inventory

01 Production map

Sheets

02 Who owns what

Hats

03 Rules